Training
You are looking at: Home : Training

Breakthrough in Pedalling Dynamics

New cleat positioning offers significant gains in power and comfort


Posted: 1 April 2009
by Richard Hallett







Foot positioning on the pedal has been the subject of considerable research in the world of cycling biomechanics over the last couple of years, spurred by studies such as that by Litzenberger, Illes, Hren, Reichel and Sabo at the Fachhochschule Technikum Wien University of Applied Sciences, Vienna.

The latest piece of research in the field, carried out by Professor Heinrich Hassenforder of the Fachhochschule Technikum at the University of Villigen-Schwennigen has gone even further and, in doing so, has demonstrated that it is a relatively simple matter to improve the power output of even highly-trained racing cyclists by between 15 and 16%.

Previous work centred on the idea of positioning the pedal beneath the metatarsus (tarsometatarsal position) in order to reduce torque in the ankle-joint and thus reduce muscular activity in the lower limb. According to Professor Hassenforder, this research failed to show any real advantage simply because it did not go far enough.

“I decided to take this idea to the extreme, reasoning that if putting the foot a little forward produces a little improvement, then putting it as far forward on the pedal as possible must produce the maximum possible benefit. Imagine my surprise when I found that the resulting increase in power ouput was such that I may, despite being 62 years old and in only moderate condition, take part in the world masters’ pursuit championship for my age group this year.”

His breakthrough, reported in a small-circulation German cycling club newsletter and thuse missed by much of the world’s cycling media, builds on recent research that has shown that even top cyclists neither deliver constant crank-torque nor flex the ankle excessively. Considering these facts and making biomechanical considerations it seems possible that much of the muscular output of the lower limb is used exclusively to stabilize the ankle. Torque in the ankle joint is - due to the long lever arm - fairly high.

By repositioning the pedal cleat on the heel of the shoe – a technique the professor calls ‘Heel Pedalling’, the torque in the ankle joint is effectively reversed, allowing the powerful anterior tibialis and extensor digitorum longis muscles to pull the forefoot upwards and thus force the heel down. This not only focuses the high pressures generated by cycling on the heel, which is well-adapted to such work, but optimizes the entire pedal stroke for high-cadence, high torque output.

RoadCyclingUK decided to put the theory to the test. We screwed a pair of Shimano SM-SH51 mtb cleats to the heels of an old pair of shoes using countersunk self-tapping screws trimmed to length. The rubber sole was also trimmed to permit easy entry and exit with SPD pedals.

Not wishing to be the subject of ridicule, we carried out the test on a turbo trainer on the privacy of out own back yard, measuring power output using a Cyclops PowerTap hub.

According to Professor Hassenforder, a major advantage of the new cleat position is that it allows the standard cleat to be retained, in turn permitting the cyclist new to Heel Pedalling to take an occasional rest by reverting to the conventional pedal position. This allowed us to make a direct comparison without excessive time out for adjustments.

Initial results were very encouraging; sustaining a pulse of 158bpm, the test subject averaged 327W for two minutes with conventional foot placement and 379W for the same duration with Heel Pedalling, which correlated closely with the 15% power gain claimed by the professor.

Given the ease with which the change can be made, we expect this new technique to be widely taken up and will be trialling it extensively in a wide range of riding conditions.

The only possible drawback we can see is the difficulty of heel mounting any other cleat design than the SPD type. Given the power gain, few cyclists will hesitate to make the move to SPD shoes and steel cleats.


Previous article Previous article:
Lezyne Classic Floor Drive pump
Next article:Next article
Shimano launches new Ultegra 6700

TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle


Discuss this story

massive toe overlap?


Posted: 01/04/2009 11:06

aaarrrggghhh - enough already of April 1st...!
Posted: 01/04/2009 11:32

You'll like this one though...

Model Shift for Top Gear



Posted: 01/04/2009 11:57

I like it - very funny.  Though if there were the slightest truth in it I would be dismayed - wouldn't want old Jeremy to be paid to utter a single word on cycling.  Far better that he should be turned into a lollipop lady.
Posted: 01/04/2009 16:19

http://chargebikes.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341d4cf253ef010536bb2f56970c-pi

Seems this is already being investigated by the cycling gurus at Top Shop, Oxford Street...


Posted: 02/04/2009 13:27

News travels fast... We all know the chaps at Charge are ahead of the game...
Posted: 02/04/2009 15:07

April fools or not - you don't do quad pushes with your toes so there maybe some purchase in cleat position adjustment?
Posted: 03/04/2009 07:50

This 'heel cleat' article may be an April fool, but there is a serious, and growning, number of people who are looking at cleats positioned under the arch of the foot.
Posted: 03/04/2009 10:11

http://biomac.webstudios.at/images/stories/tradvsbio1.jpg


Who would dig a spade with his toes? However, there is no benefit from doing heel pushes with any cadence higher than 30 rps/min for an extended period of time either. Neither there is an up-n'-commin' individual veteran pursuit champion nor the university in Germany mentioned.

Congratulations to Richard Hallett, excellent April fool! 

What is true though is that mounting your cleats mid-foot does boost your performance on the bicycle. 

"In fact, my power-heart rate ratio which I tracked for years improved by 9%. That's a huge change." America's well-known coach and book-author Joe Friel stated back in 2007already. While his readings are of course subject to individual conditions and lesser trained people often get more benefits from the change in cleat position to mid-foot, the logic behind this finding is simple and irresistible. Just browse: http://biomac.webstudios.at/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=16&Itemid=9⟨=en and discover why. Like Matt writes - it gets increasing support from a growing number of those who gave it an unbiased try. In opposite to 1998 when I came up with this idea, today two out of three pairs of cycling shoes get ordered with cleats mounted midfoot. So who knows, maybe next time turning up at your local cycling club with cleats mounted ball-above-axle will result in being told an April fool?


Posted: 03/04/2009 13:53

Surely if the cleat is closer to the heel then you get less of a turning force for the same effort because the pivot point is closer to the cleat? I certainly don't pedal without some plantar flexion of the foot so force is being applied.

It must be said though that my knowledge of physics has been questioned on here before (well that degree was a long time ago)


Posted: 03/04/2009 13:58

I trust you clicked on the link in the article, bio-freak?
Posted: 03/04/2009 14:06

 @Salmon

Longer distance/lever to execute a given amount of work results in less (peak) leg force necessary to do the job, right? This is why cyclists with midfoot position report that they seem to enjoy m o r e power. Put into correct terms this means that they need l e s s (peak) torque to execute the same job thus tyring less and persevering longer on a given workout.

The corresponding law in physics describes a hoist/pulley with the bonus in the present setup that the relatively (ineffective) upstroke gets even diminished.

This also explains why it is a myth that using midfoot/bio-mxc² would slow down a road sprinter. While the first stroke may feel slower, riders usually win their (road) sprint because they can push a higher gear ratio for longer.    

@ Richard

Thanks for the brilliant story. I enjoyed reading it very much. I am of course familiar with Litzenberger's et al 'The influence of Pedal Foot Position on Muscular Activity during Ergometer Cycling'. Why do you ask?


Posted: 03/04/2009 14:46

bio-freak wrote (see)

 I am of course familiar with Litzenberger's et al 'The influence of Pedal Foot Position on Muscular Activity during Ergometer Cycling'. Why do you ask?


Just wondered. After experiment I do in fact ride with my cleats significantly further rearward than most performance cyclists I have consulted and have persuaded a couple of riding buddies to try it with good results. I don't go as far as tarsal-metatarsal pedalling but moved the cleats rearwards to reduce the forefoot lever arm component of the foot/ankle/calf system and therefore reduce the load on the calf for any given pedal pressure while retaining the effect of foot flexion on pedalling smoothness.

When I reacquired in 2006  a racing cycle I first owned in 1986, I was amazed by the foot position imposed by the toeclip length and the cleat slot placement on some Duegi shoes bought at the same time. In order to place the foot in my now preferred position I have to move the cleat as far back as possible and pack the toeclip mount by 10mm. Riding the way I used to in comfort was almost impossible


Posted: 03/04/2009 16:48

Richard, ever tried my shoes with genuine midfoot cleat placement? If not contact

us under info@biomac.biz and I'll be pleased to push the door open for an experience

even an 'artigiano' like the one mentioned in your thread couldn't dream of. 

No April fool, guaranteed.


Posted: 03/04/2009 17:44

I've heard of a few studies saying moving the cleat back a bit increases power.  What they don't look at is that there is a trade-off between power and versatility/comfort.  Not many of use ride in the same position for the same numer of minutes.  Having a more forward cleat position allows for adjustments to be made with the angle of the foot to fit with shifted seat position (e.g. fwd TT, back climbing) and in deed out of the saddle. 

Most people have inconsistency in leg length, adjustment in foot angle (i.e. toes up/down wrt heel) helps compensate for this. 

 Also, floot flexion smooths the leg motion somewhat at the top and bottom of the stroke.

We all like cleats forward 'cos it's more comfortable!


Posted: 04/08/2009 07:21

We all like cleats forward 'cos it's more comfortable!

So what are you saying? Every cyclist should ride with the foot as far back as possible? We already do because we have found it to be the best placement?

I have seen numerous cases where advising someone to move the cleat back a bit has improved power and comfort and none where the reverse has been true.

The precise position of the foot over the pedal axle is obviously variable, but putting the foot slightly further forward, with the big toe joint perhaps just in front of the axle, does not preclude any of the benefits to pedalling action listed above. On the other hand, having the foot too far back places extra load on the calf muscle and can cause anything from early fatigue to cramp.

It is, however, beneficial to really fast pedalling to have the foot further back because, as stated above, 'floot flexion smooths the leg motion somewhat at the top and bottom of the stroke'.

So it's a matter of finding the foot placement that suits a particular person's preferred pedalling style. Experiment a bit if not sure.


Posted: 04/08/2009 09:37

Talkback: Breakthrough in Pedalling Dynamics

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct: