Health and injury
You are looking at: Home : Health and injury

Food for thought… food for Sport

How much energy do you burn? How much fat are you carrying? And does it all matter? Dr. Garry Palmer explains the 'burning' issues...


Posted: 21 January 2005
by Dr. Garry Palmer - Sportstest Ltd.

Whilst the shelves of your local bookshop are filled with 100’s of books on diet, and regimens to lose weight, careful consideration must be given to whether these strategies are appropriate to individuals undertaking exercise.

Scientific data from the early 1970’s showed that the resting energy requirements were typically 42% of energy from carbohydrate, 41% from fat and 17% from protein (Knoebel, 1971). Therefore if energy is consumed in these ratios and in appropriate quantities, it is sufficient to maintain both health and a constant body weight for sedentary individuals. However, because of the energy stores within the body, the intake of food in these proportions is not sufficient for active or athletic individuals.

Considering that a typical adult male of 80kg (~12st 8lb) and 15% body fat will have the capacity to store carbohydrate in the muscle to a maximum of 300-400g, and a total liver store of 80-100g, this means that when the body is fully loaded with carbohydrate, at best, it will have available 500g of carbohydrate. With each 1g of carbohydrate yielding just over 5 kcal of energy, the total energy available from carbohydrate is approximately 2000 kcal.

In comparison the same individual will be carrying a total of 12 kg of fat, which equates to over 50 times the amount of energy as that stored within carbohydrate (~115,000 kcal). Even if that individual should lose a large proportion of their fat mass, and be carrying just 6% body fat (the equivalent of an elite endurance athlete), their total body mass would fall to 72.3 kg, with a drop of 7.7 kg of body fat, they would still be storing around 40,000 kcal of energy as fat. This fat storage would rise by 10.7 kg and a total of ~215,000 kcal, for someone carrying 25% body fat (this is overweight, but not clinically obese!)


Table 1: Percentage body fat, fat mass, and energy available

Weight (Kg)------% Body Fat------Lean Mass (Kg)------Fat Mass (Kg)------Fat Energy (kcal)
72.3-------------6-----------68.0-----------4.3-----------40,000
80.0------------15-----------68.0-----------12.0-----------115,000
90.7------------25-----------68.0-----------22.7-----------215,000

So with all this energy available from fat, why are the limited stores of carbohydrate of importance? Quite simply, the burning of fat as a fuel is a long slow process, and does not yield as high an energy release as carbohydrate. Oxygen is needed to burn either fat or carbohydrate, unfortunately, there is a limit to how much oxygen the body can take up and use. For an elite endurance athlete this can be as much as five to seven litres of oxygen every minute, but it is unlikely that much more than four litres of oxygen can be extracted from the air and used every minute during sustained exercise. Given that for each litre of oxygen the energy yield from fat is 4.686 kcal, and from carbohydrate it is 5.047, during high intensity work, where the ability to consume oxygen is near its limit, the body will preferentially burn carbohydrate as it provides a greater amount of energy to move the body. The final twist to the release of energy, is that for each litre of oxygen used approximately 0.5 g of fat would be burnt, whereas nearly 1.25 g of carbohydrate is utilised.

So for every minute of exercise, the individual consuming four litres of oxygen would be burning 5 g of carbohydrate. Even with a full carbohydrate store, enough to sustain just 100 minutes of exercise before the energy source is depleted, and exercise has to slow or stop completely. This is the process that occurs when the marathon runner “hits the wall”, both muscle and blood levels are carbohydrate at are a level so low that exercise cannot be continued, and in some cases that full brain function cannot be sustained, and collapse occurs.

The level of dietary carbohydrate has a large impact on the levels of muscle glycogen (the storage form of carbohydrate). In 1967 Bergstrom and his colleagues clearly demonstrated the effects of a low (5%), moderate (40%) and high (82%) carbohydrate diet. When individuals eat the low carbohydrate diet, glycogen levels remained low, and the athletes could only tolerate moderate intensity exercise for 60 minutes before fatigue, whereas with the high carbohydrate intakes, muscle glycogen storage was high, and athletes exercised for over 3 hours before fatigue. This is one of many examples showing, the importance of high dietary carbohydrate for individuals undertaking exercise.

Similarly in 1980, Coggan and Miller published scientific data which suggested that when individuals undertook just an hour of moderate to intense exercise everyday, it took only three days to empty a moderate glycogen store, when consuming a moderate carbohydrate intake (following the recommendations of Knobel). .Whereas if a high carbohydrate diet was consumed, the result was near full repletion of the glycogen stores to allow normal training on subsequent days. Similarly, Backx and Palmer (2002) have shown that with a high carbohydrate intake, competitive performance was maintained in three days of simulated competition, whereas large drops in performance occurred when a moderate carbohydrate diet was consumed.

Thus, the overwhelming wealth of scientific data suggests that to maintain optimal performance, sufficient levels of dietary carbohydrate need to be consumed. In terms daily intake, 60-75% of the daily energy should come from carbohydrates. This will ensure that carbohydrates burnt during exercise are replaced daily. In order to compensate for differing body sizes, the intakes can be related to body mass. Target intake will be between 5 and 10 g of carbohydrate per Kg of body mass. The actual need will be determined by the amount of exercise being undertaken (in terms of hours per day), the intensity of exercise (the higher the intensity, the more carbohydrates are burnt), and also the type of exercise (weight bearing exercise such as running, requires a greater amount of energy than non-weight bearing exercise such as swimming or cycling).

This Article first appeared in London Sport Magazine London Sport Magazine


  • For more information on Sportstest Ltd. go here
  • Or call Garry on 01384 70099

  • Have you got a question for Garry? Email it to us and we'll pass it on

Previous article Previous article:
Revolution 7
Next article:Next article
RCUK Jersey Amnesty - AUCTION

TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle

Related Products


Discuss this story

It's what we need really, ain't it ? As a an added point on this - if your weight is dropping, does this impact levels of carb stored ? And any influence of age on these arguments ?
Posted: 21/01/2005 17:16

SloBoy, in answer to your two questions:

1) If you weight is dropping this will not influence your carbohydrates stores, so long as the weight loss is coming from fat mass, and not muscle mass (carbohydrate is stored in the muscle, and storage can be increased slightly with training).

2) There is a slight influence of age. Generally as you pass the 30 mark, you will need a lower calorific intake, and you will store less fat!

Hope this helps, and hope you will look forward to future articles which will expand on these topics further.

Regards

Garry


Posted: 23/01/2005 19:48

Thanks for article Gary. Do we not lose muscle mass if protein levels are not maintained/increased ?
Posted: 25/01/2005 11:43

Arthur, you do need protein to maintain or increase muscle mass, over the next few articles i will go into the specifics, but essentially, it is not that much (usually about 1 to 1.2 g of protein per Kg body mass).

Garry


Posted: 25/01/2005 18:49

is a bmi of 19.5 healthy for a competing cyclist/rower?
Posted: 02/05/2005 19:20

probably not! Most elite rowers (particularly) score as being obese because of high muscle mass. I would suggest that you do not use BMI as it is not relevant for an athletic population. With this BMI you are probably tall, lean, and perhaps could do with a bit more muscle mass to increase your power output.

Garry


Posted: 02/05/2005 19:37

yeah obese doesn't come into it.. i am 6 foot 4 and 71.5 kilos, my coach who clearly doesnt have a clue about nutrition or much else has told me to put on weight but this is coming from a fat unfit bastard who reckons the best energy comes fomr mars bars and lean muscle comes form eating "lots of steak" we recently found out he had been stopping us getting tuna cos "steak has more protein"!
Posted: 02/05/2005 19:47

i think i have previously been eating too little, i got cold easily then had hot flushes, food sat in my stomach for ages, really bad farts! legs constantly tired etc....
Posted: 02/05/2005 19:59

sounds like you need a coach who knows what he is talking about!
Posted: 02/05/2005 20:00

oh yes we do.... He has royally F**ked up a pretty talented and keen rowing crew..
Posted: 02/05/2005 20:06

eat him, that should help you put some weight on.

tuck into some protein shakes james.
Posted: 02/05/2005 22:00

you reckon, i am getting that cold,weak feeling again today. Also does anyone else get that constant pins and needles feeling in the calves?
Posted: 04/05/2005 15:58

checked the bmi 18.4 now!
Posted: 12/06/2005 16:56

BMI is not worth the paper it is printed on!!
Posted: 19/06/2005 00:17

good i suspected as much.. my england rugby mate is "obese"
Posted: 19/06/2005 16:54

Hi

Garry, could you please clear up this for me. I quote from a sports training web site and would like to have expert opinion

'First, it does not matter where the fuel comes from while you are exercising; in the end (ie later in the day) your body will replenish and rebalance your energy stores. So a calorie surplus will always end up increasing your body fat; and a calorie deficit will always end up reducing your body fat. The source of fuel while you are exercising is irrelevant.
Second, what matters is the total amount of calories you burn; not the proportion that come fat. If you exercise at lower intensity, a higher proportion may come from body fat, but this may be a smaller absolute number of calories.'

This go's right to the heart of my dilemha, is it better on limited time to train full on or spend more time taking it easy at low intensity. My problem with the quote is that it seems a bit of a sweeping statement and doesn't address optimum lean body growth.

Many Thanks

James

Posted: 24/02/2006 14:26

Another question Garry.......If weight bearing exercise uses more carbohyrate, am I still using more on my run, than my time trial, even if my heart rate is much higher in the latter ?
Posted: 24/02/2006 15:49

Talkback: Food for thought… food for Sport

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct: