Commuting Reviews
You are looking at: Home : Commuting Reviews

Fixed Wheel Fundamentals

A old-school fixed wheeler spills the beans...


Posted: 8 February 2008
by Richard Hallett

Fixed Wheel Week

Fixed wheel, trendy? Who’d have guessed 25 years ago, when the only cyclists riding around with one sprocket minus freewheel were either ancient diehard tourists or, like RCUK’s editor, impecunious types lacking the funds to afford the luxury of gears? Indeed, my first season of competition started on fixed, although that soon changed…

It’s the purity of fixed wheel that gives it that contemporary appeal. Unlike the world of gears, nothing much has changed on the fixed wheel front in a quarter of a century bar better tyres and the option of going for a carbon fork or titanium frame if you really have money to burn. There is, after all, almost no performance advantage to be gained by using flash parts on a machine that, speed-limited as it is by the gear ratio it wears, offers an alternative route to cycling satisfaction.

Let’s start, then, with that gear ratio. It is, after all, the key to the whole affair. Go too high and, while you’ll be king on the flat for perhaps an hour or so, a few standing starts, the odd stiff little climb and an extra 30 minutes or so will leave you praying for two more teeth on the back. Too low and – well, what is too low? 63inches is a practical minimum for general road use, but few fixies carry such an easy gear. Even 66inches or thereabouts is seen as too low judging by the cadence of the average fixer flogging home along the Embankment.

Is 66 inches enough?

This is a shame, for 66inches - 48x19 – or similar - is where it is at. Fast enough for rapid cruising but low enough to get over pretty significant lumps, 66 does what fixed is supposed to do. It helps with the development of that supple pedal stroke beloved of old-time roadies, but challenges on the climbs and standing starts. Low enough to be useable on a fixed tour, it is high enough to give the genuinely fast pedaller a fighting chance on the urban blast.

Where does this leave the double-sided hub? Just right for fitting that occasionally useful bigger gear. Or, to put it another way, you can have a bail-out big sprocket for when your usual 74inches suddenly feels way too high. Double sided is, of course, a form of cheating in that, in an ideal world, a fixed rider should have to choose a gear and stick with it through thick or thin. But, hey; I ride with two sprockets because otherwise the spare thread on my rear hub will get dirty…

chas roberts fixed

Cut yourself some slack

Chain tension is the next consideration, and it is if anything of even greater importance. That’s ‘cos a tight chain will kill the hub bearings very quickly, while a slack chain may jump the rear sprocket at high pedalling speeds. If this happens, the rear wheel will probably lock and you will crash. How tight is right? If the chain feels like the skin of a drum, it is too tight. There should be about 3mm of play – not just movement – at its taut spot. Tighten a chain as much as you like and you will not get rid of some movement up and down if you manipulate with the fingers. This is simply elastic stretch in the plates. Free play can be felt thanks to the sudden change in resistance to further movement.

An easy way to get this right is to pull the wheel back and nip up the track nuts before gently turning the wheel. Tap the chain with your spanner or Allen key to find the point at which it suddenly goes taut and stop the wheel there. This happens because no chain wheel is perfectly concentric. There will be a high spot that will take up chain slack. Some fixed authorities suggest playing around with the chainring to try to get rid of the high spot, but unless the chain has more than about 12mm/1/2 inch of slack at its loosest, there is little need. When the chain goes taut, loosen the right-hand nut and move the wheel until the chain has the right amount of slack. Nip the nut back up. If the wheel is not central between the stays, loosen the left-hand nut and adjust. This has only a small effect on chain slack.

To save time, once you have found the high spot, commit its position, or rather the angle of the crank, to memory and put the crank at the same angle each time you need to adjust the chain slack.

To lock or not to lock

Should you use a lockring? The only time it is absolutely necessary is when you have only one brake on the front wheel. The rear wheel with fixed sprocket then legally constitutes your back brake but only when fitted with a lockring. This brings us to the question of rear brakes. Fixed purists will stoutly maintain that a rear rim brake is unnecessary. In theory, this is true. In practice, a rear brake makes life a lot easier, not least because having two brake levers makes holding the bars when dancing out of the saddle a lot more effective. Fit two and, if you want to enjoy the single brake experience, use only the front…

Chain width is another, but slightly less, contentious issue. The only real drawback to a derailleur chain is that it is designed to shift across sprockets and, if run too slack, will climb off more readily than a 1/8th chain. Otherwise, fit a narrower chain and sprockets. You’ll save a bit of weight and enjoy a smoother transmission.

The same gear achieved with a larger chainring and sprocket will feel smoother and more efficient, but will weigh more. It will also take more effort to accelerate thanks, believe it or not, to the weight of the chain. Smaller is generally better in this respect, although 42t is about the minimum chainring size worth fitting to avoid the ‘soft’, spongy feel associated with tiny chainrings.


Forwards dropouts allow easy wheel removal

Home brew heaven

Building a fixed bike is fun, but if going the home-brewed route, beware of a couple of potential pitfalls. Unless you have long rear dropouts or ends, you will have problems with chain adjustment. There are solutions, but finding a suitable frame in the first place is better. It doesn’t have to have the correct spacing between the dropouts – normally 120mm. Many fixed hubs have enough washers, spacers and locknuts to allow adjusting for with. With the right hub it is perfectly possible to build a wheel to 120mm or 130mm Over Locknut Dimension as required.

The key to a smooth and safe fixed transmission is chain line. The chain must run straight from the chainring to the sprocket without deviating if it is to be safe at high revolutions. Chain line can be checked by measuring the distance of the sprocket teeth from the dropout inner face, subtracting this from half the rear wheel dropout spacing and comparing this to the distance of the chainring from the frame centre line. Find this by measuring the seat tube diameter and adding half to the chainring tooth distance from the side of the seat tube.

Look for a frame with adequate bottom bracket height. Less than 275mm may well cause problems with pedal clearance when cornering, which can be addressed by fitting shorter cranks.

On which subject… conventional wisdom says ride short cranks on fixed because you need to be able to pedal fast. I ride 175mm on mine, just as on my road bikes. This means I get the same training effect, and can transfer the high fixed cadence to my geared machinery. Furthermore, I get a bit more torque on steeper hills at the expense of absolute top speed downhill.

But don’t be swayed; choose your own gear, crank length and cadence and enjoy the ride. Carry a cool spanner so other fixed riders can see it and, whatever you do, keep those fingers out of the transmission. Tight (but not too tight)chain, ride safe!


Previous article Previous article:
Bäckstedt Back In Training
Next article:Next article
Downland Cycles Spring Challenge

Discuss this story

Nice article, I'm a fixie newbie and it's great to read up on fixie lore. My chain has been ticking quite a bit this week, so I will now try applying your advice on tension.
Posted: 09/02/2008 10:54

Yes, great article. My club, the Windsor section of the South Bucks DA all the men rode 72" fixed, the women 68". For long distance tours we had a 21T sprocket as an alternative to the 18T. These two gears took me all over the SW of the UK, tours through Wales to Borth and to the North of Scotland, with very little walking. Fixed is ideal for city work, starting and stopping at lights and generally fine control of the bike. Although I never tried it, a friend used to ride 3/32 chainwheel and sprockets with a 1/8 chain. This allowed for some misalignment of the drive system.
Posted: 14/02/2008 03:44

It was fixed for me this morning (thats 4.30am, not so cold today) on my slightly flatter route to work. There was a bit of a headwind but on the fixed you don't notice it that much as one pedal just follows the other. I run a 42t chainwheel with a 17t sprocket which is a 67" gear. This enables me to get up about a one in twelve and I can twiddle it up to 35mph on descents, it's a good mid range gear and I run 3/32nd chainwheel and sprockets but with an 1/8th chain. This is quiet, runs true and is a bullet proof drivetrain. My fixed iron was built up using an old Dawes Mirage road frame with road dropouts and quick release hube so I don't have to carry a spanner if I get a (whisper it - a puncture) Absolutely no problems here oh and only one brake with a lockring on the sprocket. I try to do a journey without touching the brake at all, just relying on the fixed to slow as required. Fixed is a fun ride and a great addition to your bike stable.  
Posted: 14/02/2008 07:02

To me the most important aspect of fixed wheel is the feeling of being part of the machine. Providing the gear is correct, you can ride over many small hills without any greater effort. The worst drawback I found was in a 160 km TT where I had to get off at 120km and run 100m to ease my legs. On gears you can just stretch your legs without stopping. If it had not been a race, the problem would not have happened.
Posted: 14/02/2008 08:21

I know what you're saying Phil, I rode a 100mile time trial on a 81" fixed quite a few years ago, and I was pissing blood for the next 24hrs. I think I got third handicap - big deal. It's nice when you just get a little tail wind or the gradient runs down some and you just click with the bike, at one with the machine.
Posted: 14/02/2008 12:48

Graham, why were you leaking blood ?
Posted: 14/02/2008 12:52

Nice bunch of posts. I rode a '25'on the Washington course in Sussex last year on my Roberts with 84" and managed 1h 4' 48" when I had been hoping to get under the hour. Leather bar tape, a Brooks saddle and completely the wrong gear for the course were my excuses. The 1/8th chain on 3/32 sprockets idea is a good 'un, especially for a slightly 'off' chainline, butI snapped a Sachs 1/8th not so long ago and lost faith in all but expensive ones. It is also harder to keep a roller chain lubed properly than a modern derailleur chain. I used to run an old Campag Record track hub with quick release spindle and skewer until the flange cracked. Works a treat.
Posted: 14/02/2008 13:14

Hi Arthur, I really dont know about the blood, I guess I ruptured something down below, I can recall that the last 20 miles or so of the 100 was with a rising tailwind and I was really going for it as I had experienced a bad patch at around the 70 mile mark and the last bit was a turnaround so I expect I pushed things just a bit too hard. I was OK by Monday thought apart from pretty stiff legs. I'd love to ride a 12 hour but I just dont think I could suffer that much. More mental than physical.
Posted: 18/02/2008 07:05

How about a first '12' on gears, then doing it on fixed once you know what lies ahead?
Posted: 18/02/2008 10:23

I can imagine what lies ahead, monumental suffering. Its like a mountain, you have just got to climb it although you know it might just kill you. I would like to say 'I've ridden a 12'  but , but,  but  I think I'll just have to see how the training pans out this year. Would be monumentally cool though.
Posted: 18/02/2008 12:11

Go for it. I have ridden four, two on a tricycle. They are far harder than any sportive....
Posted: 18/02/2008 13:54

I'm not even going to ask what possessed you to do 2 12 hour TTs on a tricycle.
Posted: 18/02/2008 16:25

Well, when you get tired... 

It's not too bad as it happens. Unlike riding a 12 on fixed, or so I'm told


Posted: 18/02/2008 16:42

I loved riding fixed and only started when I moved over to Germany 16 years ago as this was encouraged in our club for winter. Where I´m living is fairly hilly and to get to my house you´´ve always got to climb. I was riding a 42- 17 always worked for me. Was going to ride again this year and started work on one of my old Pat Rohan frames but managed squash the frame in the vice!!!!
Posted: 21/02/2008 11:56

Get a new tube put in. The frame sounds too good to waste. 42x17 is a nice gear; about an inch smaller than 48x19. If I could find my 42t ring I'd probably be riding it instead of the latter.
Posted: 21/02/2008 13:44

I'm in the same position Graham, ridden 4 100's now (all on gears) and thoughts of a 12 have entered my head. Although the goalposts move and now 100's are not as scary as they were, I rode a 130 Audax recently and the thought of riding almost twice as far/long are a nightmare.

After saying that many people do them !


Posted: 21/02/2008 15:36

Hi guys im new both on this forum and to recreational cycling in general.

I don`t get this fixed gear thing , is it about weight or simplicity or what? Sorry I know I don`t know what Im talking about but I would have thought gears are an advantage in a stop go situation in cities.

What are the advantages?

Thanks


Posted: 24/02/2008 13:52

Simplicity, ease of maintenance, bike control, pedalling 'souplesse' ie. a supple pedalling stroke, gets to the core of cycling, trendy if you like that sort of thing, keep you warm in wnter, harder workout than riding gears.....

But a distinct disadvantage when you in the wrong gear, which is most of the time!


Posted: 25/02/2008 09:45

Something further on fixed, . . . As I don't intend riding the track this year, I have converted my track bike to road specs for time trials. The bike is an aluminium A.L.A.N. very small, 49cm seat tube, lots of seat pin but it is low. I have fitted lo pro bars plus seperate tri bars extensions and a little weinmann brake lever which pulls a miniscule brake which I don't know the make of but it's smaller than a Weinmann 500. The wheels are not special just Campag L/F on Mavic sprints and the gear is still under discussion but I will start off with 81" which should be about right for the G10/42 course I usually ride on Saturday afternoons, the Redmon C.C. events. I will alternate with my regular Ribble time trial bike and I will see how times compare between the two bike types.      
Posted: 29/02/2008 08:10

Are they open or club events, Graham? If opens, we may have to have a fixed TT challenge...
Posted: 01/03/2008 15:36

The '10's' are just club events but open to all. The Redmon guys run the 10's every Thursday evening after the clocks go forward. Also there are 10's on Saturday afternoons but I think these run on alternate weeks. Check out the Redmon web site for full info. Because the course is on the A24 - a busy main road, the riders are set off at 30 second intervals to condense the field. This is great as you usually can have your 1/2 minute man in sight which of course spurs you on to greater effort. Also you know the guy behind you can see you too. Always good tea and cakes after as well. 
Posted: 05/03/2008 07:25

Might come along and have a go. I normally ride the Kingston Phoenix evening 10s on the Wednesday. 84" and dropped bars?
Posted: 05/03/2008 10:02

What about the dangers of getting shoelaces, trouser legs etc caught up in the chain? Am scared to convert my singlespeed to a fixie for commuting purposes (it's a dolan with a Look fork and handbuilt wheels - definately more trendy than most)
Posted: 05/03/2008 11:00

Good question. Fixed wheel is potentially hazardous precisely because you can't stop pedalling if something gets caught in the transmission. This can mean anything from an 'off' to a broken leg... depending on how tough your clothing is!

Keep shoelaces tucked well away and wear trouserclips. Or rethink your apparel.


Posted: 05/03/2008 11:45

Cor blimey Cobb, shoelaces and trouser legs, where's the bike kit, actually the greatest danger when riding fixed is, having ridden gears, you see an obstruction or hazard ahead and instinctively cease pedalling whereupon you are launched upwards at a great rate. Hopefully the brain/leg co-relation is sufficiently rapid to start the leg motion again very quickly and thereby obviating physical contact with mother earth.   
Posted: 05/03/2008 11:55

Yeah, but if you just ease off slightly when you see that hazard, you should(!) just slow down nicely enough to negotiate it - you'll slow the bike down through the fixed drive chain (or fling yourself up and over the obstruction...)
Posted: 05/03/2008 12:21

Is there any real advantage to riding fixed as opposed to single freewheel ?

I've got my old Grubb (photo in Gallery) set up with a 39-16 freewheel and it seems fine. One of my mates; Frank used to race on a fixed. I had a go of his bike once and thought it felt downright dangerous. I like to be able to get my feet out of the pedals quickly in an emergency and I don't like the thought of my legs being forcibly pumped on fast downhills.


Posted: 11/03/2008 22:34

The obvious answer here is that if you have one gear and a freewheel, you might as well have lots. Fixed wheels and derailleurs don't work. There have been successful hub gears with no freewheel, the best-known being perhaps a Sturmey Archer close-ratio design. Since there are none such available on the market right now, the only option being to modify a SRAM Torpedo three-speed to get a two-speed fixed, fixed wheelers have to make do with just the one gear at a time.
Posted: 12/03/2008 10:23

You do have to give yourself the chance to get accustomed to riding fixed.  If you've been riding a freewheel fo any length of time, I imagine your first taste of a fixed wheel would be a bit unnerving (I can't actually remember when I started riding fixed).  It's probably as well to avoid steep descents until your used to the fixed, but then you simply pedal faster!! 

 I generally have two brakes, although when I used fixed for TTs I only had one, with a 'blank' lever on the other side of the bars.   I rode such a setup recently for general plodding about until a local 'gent' emerged from a lefthand turn abou 6 feet in front of me. I sort of bounced off the side of him (fortunately a glancing blow) despite kicking back so hard that I broke 4 spokes.  He started to open his window, then thought better and sped away, it's quite comforting to know that an irate, 16 stone bikie, screaming vile imprecations, can still put the fear of God into a pillock!!

I reckon I've ridden fixed for about 70% of my riding over the last 45 years or so.  When I turned out to ride a club hilly TT on a bike with gears (about 25 years ago), all the younger lads in club gathered round to witness the incredible spectacle.

I find that I'm more likely to forget when I'm on a freewheel  and try to slow down by easing back on the pedals,...just a scary!!


Posted: 01/06/2008 19:45

I'm new to this site and have just registered.

I've been riding fixed for about a year now for the daily 8 mile commute on 42x16. After 10+ years of commuting and time trials on gears I have found the fixed an absolute revelation. Definitely quicker up most hills (if they're not too steep !) and into head winds. I reckon it took a couple of months of almost daily use for my legs to 'adapt' and now I prefer fixed to gears. If anybody is thinking about fixed I'd say just go for it 1


Posted: 12/03/2010 21:10

Hello and welcome. Good to see you enjoy fixed wheel. Perhaps you might ride a fixed wheel time trial this year...
Posted: 15/03/2010 16:00

As Richard says...

In my time of riding, I think the greatest pleasure has been the feelig of 'oneness' with the bike when riding fixed  When you're fit and strong (OK a distant memory for me) the sensation of pedalling almost effortlessly on an undulating road feels a close to flying as anything I can imagine.


Posted: 15/03/2010 17:07

A fixed wheel time trial......an intriguing thought. I wonder how much quicker my PBs set in the late 90's would have been on fixed ? I'm not in a club these days having 'retired' from competition owing to family commitments etc and I'm now just a commuter (and runner !). A fixed wheel TT ?, maybe one day................  
Posted: 27/03/2010 14:45

FWIW I managed 23:04 on drop handlebars, 32 spoke wheels and 90" fixed last year on the Holmwood course, G10/42. There you go; something to aim for.
Posted: 29/03/2010 10:26

Yeah, but you're a young whipper-snapper,Richard.


Posted: 29/03/2010 10:47

From the point of view of someone considerably older than me, no doubt so. But, sadly, not from my point of view. Old Giffer is more like it...


Posted: 29/03/2010 13:17

I started 40 years ago - my second bike was a Mercian super vigorelli track bike and I instantly loved the feeling of connection with the bike that you don't get with a road bike.

My long term bike has been a Rory O'Brien track bike - 72" with front brake only. My first road bike was 10 years ago when my RO'B was in need of serious restoration. A full carbon Colnalgo - a great bike but I have always hankered after my track bike especially when riding around the West End so I am restoring my RO'B with help from those great guys at Condor - I can't wait.

I have never done a TT but I did do the first London to Cambridge on fixed - under 4 hours.


Posted: 31/03/2010 18:42

Awrite lads great posts you have put up.Im looking to take up riding a fixed bike to work when i move in sept and  wondered what sort of price tag we are talking for this gear and whether i'd be better building my own from parts?

 any suggestions would be helpful.

 cheers


Posted: 07/04/2010 18:37

Go for it, Sean.  I'd say definitely build from parts, especially for commuting.  Scrounge what you can, where you czn, get some bits on Ebay, go for cheap yet functional (I've got some Tektro calipers you can have for £5 & the postage).  Seriously, though, that is the way to go, don't get conned into buying someone lse's idea of what a fixed wheel bike should be (and don't be tempted to call it a 'Fixie').

The bike i've been riding for the last 35 years has seen various changes, but only one component has actually failed (I snapped the original steel Chater-lea righthand crak in 1986, but the crank was second hand when it was fitted and probably 40 years old then!)

Oh ... , go for a 1/8th chain and sprocket, they seem to run more smoothly and are a damn sight easier to fettle.

Good luck, and let us know how you get on (and how little it costs you!!)


Posted: 07/04/2010 23:37

Talkback: Fixed Wheel Fundamentals

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct:


Hot threads