Commuting Reviews
You are looking at: Home : Commuting Reviews

Condor Potenza

Gray’s Inn Road cycle shops latest fixed bike tested


Posted: 5 March 2009
by David Arthur

Condor Potenza
Charge Plug Racer Charge Plug Racer

Condor Cycles. For many the name conjures up a history of racing heritage, while for others the Gray’s Inn Road bicycle shop is synonymous with just one thing: fixed wheel bicycles.

The Potenza, not a new name to the Condor range but back for 2009, is pitched just below the ever-popular Pista but, price difference aside, also features track-orientated geometry. It’s a little steeper and sharper handling than the road-based Pista, so for the rider looking for a bike to race the track and ride to work, the Potenza could fit the bill.

Featuring a Dedacciai COM 12.5 double butted steel frame matched with a uni-crown double-butted steel fork, the frame and fork package will you set you back £400 or a fully-specced bike, like the one pictured, for £650.

Our test bike came stocked with Deda Piega handlebars and a Deda Logo stem, with Condor-branded headset, seatpost, saddle, sprocket, lockring and large flange hubs. A Condor brake lever operates a Shimano Sora brake caliper, a combination which provided ample braking power. Chainset is a Sugino Uno 42t model. Tyres are Vittoria Zaffiro, in pimp white.

This bike looks great. The new decals, fresh for 2009, give the bike a breath of fresh air and suit the intentions of the bike and its riders, with slanted Potenza logos along the top and seat tube. Condor supplied this aesthetically pleasing bike with bold black and white finishing kit, but the tyres, while smart fresh from the shop, soon started to look tatty. Condor supply just a front brake but if you wanted a rear brake, the frame is ready.

With a pair of pedals fitted and out on the city streets, the Condor immediately felt at home. Its handling is a fine balance between quick and steady, and having done a fair bit of track racing I found the steeper head angle and the quicker steering this brought about wasn’t a problem. Riding it needs more attention than Kona’s Paddy Wagon. However, while the Kona can be happily ridden around while you’re half asleep, the Condor demands your full attention.

And this results in a much more rewarding ride. It’s bundles of fun, and I found myself taking detours down narrow streets and sweeping fast around tight corners just for the sheer hell of it. The drop bars and single centrally-mounted brake lever limit your hand positions a bit, and I found myself hurtling along at some really very high speeds on many occasions, so attention needs to be paid in order to stay out of trouble.

RCUK Verdict

We can’t help feeling that Condor has got the fixed recipe just right with the new Potenza. Not only is it heaps of fun to ride, but it looks great and boasts true British cycling heritage - something not many brands can compete with.


good Looks, handling, heritage, track friendly

bad White tyres


performance 9
value 9
overall 9

  • www.condorcycles.com


  • Previous article Previous article:
    Kona Paddy Wagon
    Next article:Next article
    Core Bike Show 2009: First Report

    TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle


    Discuss this story

    I note that the seat post clamp bolt is on the front side of the seat tube. Is this the recommended position when clamping a carbon seat-post in a steel (or aluminium) frame - equalising pressure on the post by clamping on the opposite side to the slot in the seat tube, or is it just posey?
    Posted: 05/03/2009 09:37

    I just brought a carbon seat post from condor and the bloke who served me said that i needed an off center stem clamp, Which i got, I put it on the normal way but because the gap of the clamp is off center it covers the slot at the back on the frame, I think that is how it should be. Thats maybe why yours is fitted that way if its not an off center clamp.

    I am interested to know though.


    Posted: 05/03/2009 10:14

    It is indeed to prevent the carbon being squeezed harder in one place than another. If unbalanced pressure is put on carbon it will break it; the more uniform the forces acting on it the better it is for longevity. So, both of your solutions will work. I am a bit baffled though why not more manufacturers have followed Easton's lead by strengthening the clamp side as well as flattening the circular form on that side. Seatpost clamps facing forward just don't look right...
    Posted: 05/03/2009 11:03

    Maybe it's less to do with clamping forces, and more to do with the fact the bike will probably be ridden by a lot of people without mudguards, and forward facing slots in the seat-tube make it harder for grimey water to enter the frame - sensible and established practice amongst many frames, er, geared for the UK market.

    Ordinarily, a separate clamp might still be tightened from the rear with the slot at the front, but you can't do this with clamps that are part of the frame.

    Maybe. 


    Posted: 05/03/2009 11:09

    Ehh no. It is to distribute pressure on the carbon.

    Although forward facing slots in the seat tube to prevent water ingress is a good idea.


    Posted: 05/03/2009 12:07

    I understand off-centre clamps, but I don't see how this particular integrated frame/clamp design has any effect on pressure distribution.

    Surely the slot has to be on the same side as the bolt - so how is it any different to a rearward design (apart from limiting water ingress)? 


    Posted: 05/03/2009 12:27

    Can't see how a slot in the front of the tube is any different to a slot at the rear in terms of loading the seat post. I personally favour Scarlett's idea, espcially as I have seen the concept on frames with non-carbon seat posts.


    Posted: 05/03/2009 12:27

    Is the seat clamp on the Potenza's frame integrated? I was assuming it was a seperate clamp with the slot at the back? If it is integrated (i.e. slot on same side as bolt) I agree with RH and Scarlett, but then if it is a carbon post how can it comply with Condor's own advice re. off centre clamps and carbon posts? Personally I have been using a seperate clamp (simple, not off-centre), bolt facing fowards, with a carbon post, but I am about to change it to a clamp with an angled off-centre opening, the bolt tightening into a rotating sleeve  within the clamp, which I think will work OK with the bolt at the rear, (and as Jorrin pointed out, will look better).
    Posted: 05/03/2009 13:21

    Talkback: Condor Potenza

    First Name:
    Last Name:
    Nickname:
    Email:
    Security Image:
    Enter the code shown:

    I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct: