Bike reviews
You are looking at: Home : Bike reviews

Kinesis GranFondo tested

Scandium sportive bike from Kinesis – could it be the most versatile all-rounder?


Posted: 24 September 2008
by David Arthur

Kinesis Gran Fondo Ltd

Over the years, carbon fibre has become the requisite material for which to build bicycle frames, becoming the first choice for most people buying a bicycle. But as the black stuff becomes ever more omnipresent, there’s a growing choice of company’s offering alternative options.

Which brings us nicely to the GranFondo. The UK arm of Kinesis, headed by the chaps at Upgrade Bikes, has long been renowned for its aluminium frames. Equally well designed and keenly priced, they’ve found a place in the hearts of many UK cyclists.

So when it came to designing its first sportive specific frameset, the obvious choice might have been to borrow some of the blueprints from its carbon KR-810, but instead, they chose a different path. This led them to Easton’s doorstep, and the purchasing of a very fine Scandium tubeset. And what they’ve done with this tubeset is to produce one of the nicest bikes I’ve had the pleasure of testing.

Frame

For the tubing Kinesis paid a visit to Easton - purveyors of top quality tubesets - and came away with a bundle of the company's Sc7000 Scandium tubes. Scandium is added to aluminium to improve strength, with the increase in strength allowing for less material and thinner wall diameters to be used, resulting in a lighter frame.

The heart of the tubing lies in the tapered walls and the flared ends, which provide a large area of contact along the entire length of the tall headtube. These flared ends on both the top and head tube ensure strength and stiffness without any significant weight penalty. With these tubes a classy and understated frame has been designed and smoothly welded together - build quality is excellent, as those familiar with previous Kinesis frames will no doubt have come to expect. Into the externally machined head tube plugs a fork designed in tandem with the new frame, and they've incorporated carbon into the seatstays, and dubbed them ‘Carbonstruts’.

Perhaps the most interesting aspect is, beside the frames obvious leanings towards sportive riding, is the inclusion of mudguard mounts, opening up new possibilities of this bike being called into service through the year. Versatility, it appears, is the bikes middle name.

And all the numbers talk sportives, with Kinesis describing the GranFondo has having “plenty of 'race bike feel', it's no slack angled tourer, but the geometry is designed to be forgiving over the distance, with longer [but not too long] headtube and chainstays.”

For this 57cm tester the head and seat angles are 73.5 degrees, the wheelbase is 100.5" and the headtube is 17.5". Sizes available include 51, 54, 57, 60, 63cm (c/t), with colours Deep Blue Metallic or Black Cherry Metallic, with contrasting white/titanium decals. Claimed weight for a 54cm frame is 1.38kg.

Components

Perhaps the best way to purchase a GranFondo is to buy the frame, fork, seatpost and headset package which costs £695, and build with your favourite parts. For this test Upgrade Bikes supplied a bike bedecked with a Campagnolo Centaur groupset, with a 50/34 chainset for making easy work of hills. Uprgade distribute Tektro and Oval, so these brands filled the braking and contact points – no complaints were found here.

Wheels are from the Reynolds stable, the £350 Solitudes representing the first step onto the range. 31mm aluminum rims are laced together with 20/24 spokes and the all-up weight is 1550g. Tyres are Vittoria Open Corsa Evo-CX 23mm which boast a new Kevlar SiO2 3D Compound with added silica, for reduced rolling resistance and better grip, and a PRB puncture resistant belt placed under the tread.

Ride

For those who have not spent much time on a quality aluminium frameset, it may seem all too easy to quickly dismiss the GranFondo. Indeed, with much attention being focused on carbon fibre and the latest super light frames being released each year, the question might be why bother with aluminium.

But that would be to miss out on one of the finest rides you might ever encounter. Scandium is a marvellous material to build a bicycle frame; its weight, stiffness and ride character are all equally balanced in perfect harmony creating a sublime experience. There’s a touch of the steel feel when riding the GranFondo, but without the extra weight and with a dollop of extra responsiveness.

The measurements picked by Kinesis haven’t been plucked at random, but clearly by designers who acutely understand the target rider for the GranFondo - and that’s somebody who wants a fast riding but all-day long comfortable steed. This is one of the most pleasantly surprising bikes to pass through the RCUK test net in a long while.

Verdict

The first sportive frame from Kinesis turns out to be a cracking good ride. It meets all the necessary requirements for the frequent sportive riders, being comfortable for long sessions in the saddle but also rewarding riders who like an involving, entertaining and fast ride. This is the perfect sportive bike.


good Fantastic ride, honed geometry, comfortable, fast, price, looks, mudguard mounts

bad None what so ever

performance 10
value 10
overall 10

  • www.kinesisbikes.co.uk

  • Previous article Previous article:
    Gore Bike Wear Road Sportive: Penrith
    Next article:Next article
    Olympic heroes to join London Freewheel

    TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle


    Discuss this story

    Excellent review David and thanks for testing and reporting. Now, where's me debit card .... ?

    take care and happy riding that Z4

    Kevin Barrett 


    Posted: 24/09/2008 12:23

    Just one more question sorry, how do the Solitudes compare to the Reynolds Assaults on your Z4?

    Thanks 

    Kevin


    Posted: 24/09/2008 12:29

    The review says "carbon fibre has become ... the first choice for most people buying a bicycle".  It should follow, then, that more carbon fibre bikes are sold than aluminium now.  Is that true?


    Posted: 24/09/2008 14:14

    The answer to that question Colin depends on which segment of the bicycle market you look at. Take it as a whole, and aluminium probably is the most popular material (taking into account the number of mtbs sold, city bikes etc etc). But the context of the article was not inclusive of the entire market, but rather that of the RCUK readership.
    Posted: 24/09/2008 14:37

    Glad you liked it Kevin. It was hold to find fault with anything on the GF, and it's now vacant space in the RCUK bike shed will be a hard one to fill. Bit unfair to compare the Solitudes to the Assaults really, different pricepoint, weight etc
    Posted: 24/09/2008 14:39

    I considered this frame for a sportive bike but wondered about the angles. This frame seems unusual in that the top 3 of the 5 sizes (57,60,63) have paralell 73.5 head and seat angles according to the table on their website. Most bikes seem to slacken the seat angle and maybe steepen the head for larger sizes.

    The only reason I am bothered by this is because of my experience so far based on a total of two road bikes which I still have. A 1998 62cm raleigh special products steel with 74 head and 72 seat, and a 2001 model TCR large 74 head and 73 seat. The TCR frame is 1cm shorter (effective Top tube) with a 1cm longer stem. The bars and saddle are the same heights. The TCR seems to put more of my weight on the bars (so through my arms and shoulders) causing discomfort on longer rides particularly on long descents, and makes it feel unnerving when downhill cornering. After much puzzlement I recently put this down to steeper seat angle placing the BB being further back relative to the saddle, tipping me forward.

     I have been using the TCR for sportives including the Marmotte last year and want a better fitting replacement. As a result I have been thinking a lot about bike fit and would appreciate any comments on the above conclusions I have made. Top of my list now is a 63 cm cannondale (alu CAAD9) with 72 degree seat angle same as my old raleigh. Should I reconsider the kinesis?


    Posted: 24/09/2008 16:12

    David Arthur wrote (see)
    The answer to that question Colin depends on which segment of the bicycle market you look at. Take it as a whole, and aluminium probably is the most popular material (taking into account the number of mtbs sold, city bikes etc etc). But the context of the article was not inclusive of the entire market, but rather that of the RCUK readership.

    Fair point.  Even so, I'd be a bit suprised (but only a bit) if more RCUK readers were riding carbon than aluminium.

    I have to say, though, it's a really nice looking machine!  


    Posted: 25/09/2008 11:50

    Perhaps we need a poll to find out? Let me see what I can do...
    Posted: 25/09/2008 12:19

    David did you weigh the bike in the end? I need to know a weight you see....
    Posted: 09/10/2008 11:11

    As said in the review above, versatility is the name of the game with this frameset. I bought one for my wife about one year ago, and built it up with Ultegra and DA equipment. She loves the ride quality (having previously been riding a far stiffer and less comfortable aluminum all-out race bike). The long top tube also suits her perfectly because of her long-ish torso (in comparison to her leg length).

    I weighed her 51cm frame at 1.382 kg and the uncut fork (with 300mm steerer) was 554 grams (before I lopped 40 gm off the top), so lighter options are certainly available for this price. However, the extra weight does give me more confidence in the frame when she occasionally uses it as a light-duty tourer with fenders and rear rack attached. With the Ultegra/DA triple drivetrain, decent finishing kit, and 1.6 kg wheels, the total weight is just over 8 kg.

    My wife is also very happy with the blue finish, she says it is good to be completely different from every other new bike at the moment which is a mix of black/red/white.

    My only complaint/warning is that you should make sure that you run a tap through the eyelets in the frame before trying to put any screws into them because you may otherwise have problems with bolts jamming.


    Posted: 10/05/2010 23:43

    Very interesting, CW 3.

    Can you give some idea of what height this frame would be suitable for?

     Also, is it realistic to fit mudguards - or are they very tight to fit?


    Posted: 11/05/2010 18:48

    Talkback: Kinesis GranFondo tested

    First Name:
    Last Name:
    Nickname:
    Email:
    Security Image:
    Enter the code shown:

    I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct:


    Hot threads