Bike reviews
You are looking at: Home : Bike reviews

Bike Test - Omega Alchemy

Brighton based Omega Cycleworks are fast building a reputation. But can a UK-made titanium frame cut the road racing mustard?


Posted: 22 December 2004
by Guy Andrews

RC

Titanium has only been used successfully to make reasonably priced road bikes for about the past 20 years. There are only a few builders who have mastered the art because of one factor. Titanium is tough stuff. It blunts tools, wrecks machines and requires specialist tooling and welding to get it right. But on the plus side for us, the riders, it is stronger than steel yet lighter than triple butted 853 or Foco. It is around the same weight as 7000 series aluminium yet it lasts forever as it has an infinite fatigue life. Only carbon seems to compete, but there's something about titanium, something artisan almost.
The American master builders like Seven, Serotta, Litespeed and Merlin have set a pretty high bar when it comes to titanium frame finish and quality. In Europe De Rosa and Merckx make some excellent looking ti race bikes too. But what these bikes have in common is that they are all VERY expensive. Which is why titanium has become the material of the flash or the fortunate.


Every Omega model has its own exclusive tube set and each tube within the set is designed with a different purpose in mind. All Omega titanium frames are welded using the TIG (Tungsten Inert Gas) and pure argon is used as the shielding gas. Omega use a 6-4 titanium filler rod as they say it is the best filler to weld 3-2.5. It flows very well and it creates very neat welds, whilst being stronger than 3-2.5. All the tubes on the Alchemy are custom drawn and the headtube is individually machined to suit the frame size being worked on.

Essentially when it comes to titanium for bike tubing their are two main types 3AL-2.5V and 6AL-4V. 3AL-2.5V is an alloy consisting of 3% aluminium, 2.5% vanadium, and 94.5% pure titanium. Also known as grade 9. It's easily formable, has excellent corrosion resistance and superb fatigue life. This makes 3AL-2.5V the most used titanium when making a bike frame.

But the Alchemy gets it's very own set of 3AL-2.5V CWSR (cold worked stress relieved) seamless titanium tubes and a stiffer 6AL-4V aero down tube. 6AL-4V is an alloy containing 6% aluminium, 4% vanadium, and 90% titanium. '6/4' is mostly used for the machined parts as it's very hard to make into seamless tubes. The dropouts are laser cut from 6mm 6AL-4V sheet and all the fittings and welded on parts are CNC machined from 6AL-4V billet for the best in terms of strength.

The only thing I think Omega could learn from Seven and Serotta et al is when it comes to applying their 'marque'. The stickers just don't do the frame justice. But the overall finish on the metal work is excellent and a titanium bike always looks this good, whatever muck you ride in.


Out on the road
Titanium certainly has good riding characteristics. It's ability to spring like steel means you will find comfort high on the list, but the Alchemy also has that rare quality of a fair amount of racing clout. After riding predominantly aluminium bikes for the past 4 months I was expecting a little surprise from the Alchemy. I hadn't been expected to be blown away, but I was. The Alchemy is effortless to ride, it flies around corners and belts up climbs. You can't help but ride it fast. It is certainly as 'stiff' as they say but what I liked was the way the rear end tucked the rear wheel into the road as if you'd opened a throttle.

The Omega is yet another semi-compact frame, however Omega can custom build to your specification. My request would be for a longer head tube and that would be it. The head angle and Look HSC fork combine superbly for quick handling and smooth road holding. I was finding cobbles and things to ride over it was THAT smooth. But it was a little low for me. A 10cm drop may be OK for pro riders but not for this 20 year racing veteran with a weight and back problem.

Omega do not charge for custom sizing and if you prefer the all titanium look then they make the Helix which is £50 cheaper but has an all ti rear seat stay. Mark at Omega says that it is a little less racey but has all the comfort and stablity of the Alchemy. The carbon Columbus Carve rear end also has a lifetime warranty and if you want the bike for racing it's worth considering, just to add a little extra 'kick'.

Wheels
Campagnolo's Neutron (once the Neucleon) are a bench mark racing wheelset. They now have a set of great looking carbon hubs which received coos of delight from my club mates. Their lightweight and lateral sturdy-ness is going to improve any bike and the combo that Omega selected for this test bike would be my first choice for a practical racing 'superbike'.

Michelin Race Carbon tyres are also a racing bench mark as they are the most reliable gripping tyre I have used in all weathers and comfort wise the supple ride at 120 PSI is pretty rare in the modern 'clincher' market. They also wear well on gritty British roads. Price-wise they are not going to be for training but perfect for racing year-round in Blighty.

Components
Ah, Campagnolo. After riding Shimano 105 on the past few test bikes Campag Chorus is like an old pair of slippers - perfectly behaved and full of racing character, not my slippers you understand. Nothing wrong with 105 it's just not as nicely finished as this second in command Italian group. I like the fact that you know when you have changed gear, the positive click from the Ergos is reassuring and they are a better size for my average sized hands.

Campagnolo brakes are just a little bit better than Shimano in the wet and far more predictable whatever the weather throws at you, so you know what to expect when you haul on the levers. The differential braking (a single pivot on the rear brake) is a simple idea but it prevents lock ups and saves a few grams too.

Contact points
These USE bars are very nice on the tops, with a flat section next to the stem and a slightly raised 'lump' just before the brake lever hood. But on the drops you are in a different postcode... couldn't reach the brake levers (again) and was just way too low. Also the brake routing was an ugly mess and the bar tape all lumps and bumps. On the plus side they are nicely finished, silly-stiff and lightweight too. Omega's saddle was a bit tough for my liking but they have supplied me with their, more flexible, latest carbon one to try. So a full test on this soon.

Conclusion
Sean Yates (Tour de France stage and yellow jersey winner and team Discovery manager) tested one of these in Cycling Plus earlier this year, he said; “You would be hard pushed to find a better bike anywhere” which is praise indeed. On a more practical level Omega have an unlimited lifetime warranty on all their frames which is unusual for a racing bike. But for me the fact that they pride themselves on their ability to make cutting edge frames at a reasonable price is good news for their customers. I know that their are frames on the market with a longer pedigree for racing and finer finishing details, but I think you will struggle to find a better titanium racing 'superbike' for this money. Actually I know you won't find one, I've looked. Omega also have a matter of fact approach to building bikes, there's no techno babble or annoying acronyms or buzz words - just simple names and no frills engineering. I like that and all the Omega customers I have spoken to do too.


Good: Wonderful. Makes you want to ride, whatever the weather

Bad: You won't have a decent excuse to stay indoors...

Performance:
5/5
Value:
5/5
Overall:
5/5

Specification
Frame sizes: S, M, L & XL
Size tested: 56 (54cm top tube)
Frame tubing: Tapered triple-butted heat treated 7005 aluminium

Fork: Look HSC 4 full carbon
Headset: Campagnolo Integrated
Crankarms: Campagnolo Chorus 170 mm
Chainrings: Campagnolo Chorus
B/B: Campagnolo Chorus
Pedals: none supplied
Chain: Campagnolo Ultra 10
Freewheel: Campagnolo 10-speed 11-12-13-14-15-17-19-21-23-25T
F/D: Campagnolo Chorus
R/D: Campagnolo Record
Shifters: Campagnolo Chorus 10 speed Ergo
Handlebar: USE
Stem: Omega 12cm
Tape: Omega Cork
Brakes: Campagnolo Chorus
Wheels: Campagnolo Neutron Carbon
Tires: Michelin Carbon 700x23c
Saddle: Omega
Seatpost: USE carbon Pave
Extras: none
Colour: Ti
Weight: 1.1 kgs frame
Price: frame only £1295.00


Previous article Previous article:
Shimano R550 wheels
Next article:Next article
World Cup Keirin racing on 9th Jan 05

TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle


Discuss this story

Excellent - here's another debate. I've been waiting to kick off ! Value for money - Ti - how low can you go ? I know there a bit of "poor titanium is not as good as a good 'un in anything else", but this is one of those things that improves as the frame builders get a bit of practice. So come on, let's name the guilty men ! Airborne ? Global ?
Posted: 22/12/2004 16:23

I have ridden: Litespeeds, Merlins, a Serotta, a Merckx, an Airborne and two Omegas.

All pretty good. Merlin Extralight and Omega stand out for two reasons. The Merlin is a benchmark ti bike. And the Omega is a decent price and a very decent bike. I don't want to send this Alchemy back in a hurry!

We are testing a Global very soon.

I think budget titanium is far better than it was ten or even five years ago (un reliable far east and eastern bloc stuff). I think a lot of that was because they made mountain bikes that were clearly not up to the job, hence snapping welds and cracking seamed tubing. It's now all seamless and very well welded.


Posted: 22/12/2004 16:32

I bit the bullet a couple of months ago and ordered a custom Omega Radius. The quality of the welding is superb the bike fits like a glove on my overly long arms, is supremely confortable compared to my aluminum bikes and cruising at 20+ is a breeze. The only problem now is that I am hankering after a Predator XL mountain bike frame but the funds won't stretch that far yet.
Posted: 22/12/2004 23:04

Certainly they make an interesting proposition.

I'm gonna start organising some test rides once Christmas is out the way, but my theoretical analysis of what would suit me comes down to a reasonably sporty Ti frame with a modest build for all year use.

You could do an Airborne Zeppelin version of that for 1400-1500, or a custom built Omega Radius for maybe 1800-2000.

The real bargain bin solution of a very modest build on an Airborne Valkyrie can be yours for only 1250 and a 19lb built weight.

In that price range, you then have a million other choices of Alu/Carbon and goodness knows what else ! Guy's Condor Squadra for example.

But then again, no point cutting corners on a frame that'll outlast you.

Hmm, might need to start the retail campaign with getting measured up, so I know how much the custom sizing is worth (i.e. if I fit a stock frame, the value of custom is zero).
Posted: 24/12/2004 10:50

I was riding a Litespeed Ultimate until about 6 months ago when I switched to a Merlin Cielo. Both excellent bikes with a great feel.
I was so impressed with the Merlin that I have now swapped in my S-works Epic for a Merlin Orias MTB.
The frames, welds, finish (in fact everything!!) are top notch and last "forever" so I am hoping that they will last me for many years now. Taking JUST that specific, they may be a costly outlay, but over the years should start paying for themselves...
Posted: 24/12/2004 11:07

After 4000+ miles I'm quite happy with my Ti/Carbon Manhattan Project. I just don't get this business with slating Airborne
Posted: 25/04/2005 08:30

I've seen positive and negative reviews for Airborne but some reviews on the web aren't dated so I am not sure if their quality control is patchy or the older bikes were poor quality.

Any feelings on this?
Posted: 25/04/2005 22:12

I had one of the very early Lucky Strike MTBs too and that was fine. For the money and the fact that you can spec it as you please on line I'd say it was unbeatable. Maybe they made an error of judgement using Halfords to sell them, other than that I cant fault them
Posted: 26/04/2005 07:04

I've owned an Airborne Zep' for 18 months now and have to say it's a cracking bike. The build quality is fine with the welds all to a high standard and the bike rides in a similar manner to a quality steel frame, smoothing out the rough goat tracks that pass for back roads in Aberdeenshire. My only gripe is the height of the rear bottle cage bolts, making it difficult to access a large bottle due to the semi-compact top tub design. That's the only fault I can find with the frame. I've had the chance to look at several other Airborne's of various ages and can't say I've come across a bad one yet. A Litespeed is lighter due to it's highly manipulated tubes and does offer a slightly better quality ride but you only notice this on back-to-back rides (one of the perks of life as a bike mechanic!) and they do cost twice as much. I for one could never ride alloy again. Put it this way, my Litespeed Blade time-trial frame comes next week and that alone is worth more than my car.
Posted: 27/04/2005 09:25

Mmmm! ---- You just can't
beat titianium for comfort, ---- My left leg's full of it.
Posted: 14/06/2005 09:36

I have a Litespeed Siena and just love it,in fact al most to the point of perverseness.
I also had made a custom ti singlespeed mtb,by Setevento.and it fantastic bothin quality and cost.they kept me informed althrough the build and James is a stickler for details.Faultless service from start to finish,
Am thinking of having winter trainer built later in year.
They may be cheap but you would never belive it.
Posted: 14/06/2005 17:05

I have just bought an Omega Alchemy and its lovely. Ride is really smooth, its very responsive and the handling is noticably more confidence inspiring that anything else I have ridden so far. I find it light and quick up hills

Have K SSC/SL wheels and the HSC5 forks. Noticable how stiff and more powerful the front is in terms of climbing. Found the Omega saddle did not suit me so have swapped that.

I ride over all the bumps I used to avoid and just get on with it. My (female) riding partner says its a really sexy back end (and unfortunately she is refering to the bike.

Lovely. Didn't find anything like this quality of ride when I tried Litespeed and the Airbourbe Zepellin (undynamic) and Torch (stiff, fast, but not as compliant )
Posted: 17/06/2005 14:18

Can't offer any comparisons as my Zepellin is the only Ti I've ridden but it has handled everything I've asked of it (Spanish mountains, Flemish cobbles etc.)Still looks good and feels lively compared to 853 though that may be down to equipment.

Would love to try some more exotic brands but am still happy that the Airbourne was the best ride in my budget at the time.
Posted: 17/06/2005 17:28

I had my Zeppelin built by Paul Hewitt with a Centaur groupset and Mavic Open Pros in order to ride the Etape 2004. I've done close on 12,000 km and am delighted with it. A very smooth ride, but plenty stiff enough; good handling and beautiful to look at, with v high quality welding. I will try an Omega out of interewst, but it would have to be significantly better to persuade me to shell out another £1295.
Posted: 23/06/2005 01:34

Talkback: Bike Test - Omega Alchemy

First Name:
Last Name:
Nickname:
Email:
Security Image:
Enter the code shown:

I agree to the site's Terms and Conditions & Code of Conduct: